Rename rank one up- and downdate functions for Cholesky to rank(up/down)date#14424
Conversation
fcb89c0 to
3de9672
Compare
|
I dislike having the |
|
|
|
@jiahao I think it's pretty standard terminology for this operation, e.g. http://www.netlib.org/lapack/explore-html/d7/d15/group__double__blas__level2.html#ga35ca25bb135cd7bfdd5d6190b1aa4d07. @timholy I don't like the name. I consider myself in a process of removing the |
3de9672 to
aab1243
Compare
|
@andreasnoack I don't see how the LAPACK page you linked to substantiates this operation being called a "rank update". If anything, the documentation clearly describes a "rank 1" operation (the 1 is missing from the function name) and the notion of update is not described in the main documentation (only in the description of the arguments). Again, my point is that the phrase "rank update" is meaningless. "rank 1" is the adjectival phrase attached to "update"; "rank" itself cannot meaningfully describe any kind of update. That's why functions like "syrk" have the k - they are to describe operations dealing with "symmetric rank k" (the k cannot be omitted and still be a meaningful English phrase). How about |
|
I would even consider |
|
The |
|
But that's exactly my point regarding the name |
…/down)date Add NEWS.md entry
aab1243 to
cbf888e
Compare
|
After offline discussions, we have settled (locally) for |
Rename rank one up- and downdate functions for Cholesky to rank(up/down)date
No description provided.