[ruby/prism] Correctly handle and? and similar on ruby 4.0

It gets confused for syntax introduced in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20925
But it actually should be a plain method call.
`!`/`?` are not valid as part of an identifier, methods
however allow them as the last character.

Fixes [Bug #21946]

ruby/prism@5d80bc5e1a

Author: Earlopain

prism/prism.c

@@ -10034,8 +10034,21 @@ parser_lex(pm_parser_t *parser) {
                                 following && (
                                     (peek_at(parser, following) == '&' && peek_at(parser, following + 1) == '&') ||
                                     (peek_at(parser, following) == '|' && peek_at(parser, following + 1) == '|') ||
-                                    (peek_at(parser, following) == 'a' && peek_at(parser, following + 1) == 'n' && peek_at(parser, following + 2) == 'd' && !char_is_identifier(parser, following + 3, parser->end - (following + 3))) ||
-                                    (peek_at(parser, following) == 'o' && peek_at(parser, following + 1) == 'r' && !char_is_identifier(parser, following + 2, parser->end - (following + 2)))
+                                    (
+                                        peek_at(parser, following) == 'a' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, following + 1) == 'n' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, following + 2) == 'd' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, next_content + 3) != '!' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, next_content + 3) != '?' &&
+                                        !char_is_identifier(parser, following + 3, parser->end - (following + 3))
+                                    ) ||
+                                    (
+                                        peek_at(parser, following) == 'o' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, following + 1) == 'r' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, next_content + 2) != '!' &&
+                                        peek_at(parser, next_content + 2) != '?' &&
+                                        !char_is_identifier(parser, following + 2, parser->end - (following + 2))
+                                    )
                                 )
                             ) {
                                 if (!lexed_comment) parser_lex_ignored_newline(parser);
@@ -10106,6 +10119,8 @@ parser_lex(pm_parser_t *parser) {
                                 peek_at(parser, next_content) == 'a' &&
                                 peek_at(parser, next_content + 1) == 'n' &&
                                 peek_at(parser, next_content + 2) == 'd' &&
+                                peek_at(parser, next_content + 3) != '!' &&
+                                peek_at(parser, next_content + 3) != '?' &&
                                 !char_is_identifier(parser, next_content + 3, parser->end - (next_content + 3))
                             ) {
                                 if (!lexed_comment) parser_lex_ignored_newline(parser);
@@ -10122,6 +10137,8 @@ parser_lex(pm_parser_t *parser) {
                             if (
                                 peek_at(parser, next_content) == 'o' &&
                                 peek_at(parser, next_content + 1) == 'r' &&
+                                peek_at(parser, next_content + 2) != '!' &&
+                                peek_at(parser, next_content + 2) != '?' &&
                                 !char_is_identifier(parser, next_content + 2, parser->end - (next_content + 2))
                             ) {
                                 if (!lexed_comment) parser_lex_ignored_newline(parser);

test/prism/fixtures/4.0/leading_logical.txt

@@ -14,8 +14,3 @@ and 3
 or 2
 or 3
 
-1
-andfoo
-
-2
-orfoo

test/prism/fixtures/and_or_with_suffix.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+foo
+and?
+
+foo
+or?
+
+foo
+and!
+
+foo
+or!
+
+foo
+andbar
+
+foo
+orbar

test/prism/ruby/ripper_test.rb

@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ class RipperTest < TestCase
       ]
     end
 
+    if RUBY_VERSION.start_with?("4.")
+      incorrect += [
+        # https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21945
+        "and_or_with_suffix.txt",
+      ]
+    end
+
     # https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21669
     incorrect << "4.1/void_value.txt"
     # https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19107