|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: A digital exclusion risk index |
| 3 | +author: Fran Barton |
| 4 | +date: 2026-03-18 |
| 5 | +date-format: "MMM D, YYYY" |
| 6 | +format: |
| 7 | + revealjs: |
| 8 | + theme: [default, ../su_presentation.scss] |
| 9 | + transition: none |
| 10 | + chalkboard: |
| 11 | + buttons: false |
| 12 | + preview-links: auto |
| 13 | + slide-number: false |
| 14 | + auto-animate: true |
| 15 | + footer: | |
| 16 | + view slides at [the-strategy-unit.github.io/data_science/presentations][ds_presentations] |
| 17 | +--- |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## The general idea |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +- Similar in concept to the IMD |
| 22 | +- Focused set of indicators, differently weighted |
| 23 | +- Areas where people are more likely to be digitally excluded |
| 24 | +- Shiona wrote [a lit review][litrev2021] on this |
| 25 | +- A tool / dataset we could publish as a mini-site |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +[litrev2021]: https://www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk/publications/reviewing-evidence-digital-inclusion |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## The story |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +- Unfinished business 😏 |
| 34 | +- [Technical work][tsuderi] mostly done |
| 35 | +- GMCA have published [a similar tool][gmca]... |
| 36 | +- ...but I think we can do better! |
| 37 | +- It would be good to validate our index and publish supporting analysis |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +[tsuderi]: https://github.com/The-Strategy-Unit/tsuderi |
| 41 | +[gmca]: https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/what-we-do/digital/digital-strategy/empowering-people-and-communities/get-online-greater-manchester/greater-manchester-wide-support/digital-exclusion-risk-index-deri/ |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +## The potential |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +- A product that might support bids for work |
| 48 | +- Add an element to our understanding of intersecting inequalities |
| 49 | +- Relevant to any work and comms around digital health and social exclusion |
| 50 | +- An analytic element in evaluation work |
| 51 | +- Background data for qualitative work for example on patient experience |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +## Questions |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +- Is this useful? |
| 57 | +- Explore what it might tell us that the IMD doesn't already |
| 58 | +- Who else is interested in collaborating on this? |
| 59 | +- Or just chipping in your ideas? |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +[ds_presentations]: https://the-strategy-unit.github.io/data_science/presentations/2026-03-18_digital_exclusion/ |
0 commit comments