Skip to content

Add prometheus metrics to serving#316

Merged
feast-ci-bot merged 6 commits into
feast-dev:masterfrom
zhilingc:metrics-serving
Nov 25, 2019
Merged

Add prometheus metrics to serving#316
feast-ci-bot merged 6 commits into
feast-dev:masterfrom
zhilingc:metrics-serving

Conversation

@zhilingc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@zhilingc zhilingc commented Nov 21, 2019

Exposing metrics for feast serving via prometheus.

Still thinking of what metrics to add for batch retrieval, but currently for online serving, the following metrics are exposed:

  • method latencies
  • number of rows missing
  • number of rows stale
  • number of rows requested

Additionally, we track:

  • specs cache last updated time
  • number of of feature sets served by the serving instance

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhilingc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zhilingc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/retest

@zhilingc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/retest

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Nov 23, 2019

Worth a happy path test?

@zhilingc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Worth a happy path test?

what do you mean?

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Nov 23, 2019

Worth a happy path test?

what do you mean?

I mean is it worth adding a regression test to just ensure that this functionality works?

@woop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

woop commented Nov 24, 2019

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot removed the lgtm label Nov 25, 2019
@davidheryanto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit a79c77b into feast-dev:master Nov 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants