Complex Workflow: Chaining dependent GraphQL API Mutations based on dynamic Webhook payloads in GitHub Actions #177562
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
Hi API experts,
I am trying to build a complex CI/CD automation and have hit a wall regarding dynamic, dependent API calls.
My Setup:
repository_dispatchWebhook to my repo.{"tasks": [{"id": 1, "action": "build_staging"}, {"id": 2, "action": "run_tests"}, {"id": 3, "action": "deploy_prod"}]}.repository_dispatch.The Complex Problem:
Inside the GitHub Action, I need to:
tasksarray from the Webhook payload.tasksarray.check-run, update adeployment_status, etc.).check_run_id).How can I reliably manage this chain of dependent GraphQL API calls inside a single GitHub Action workflow? Is parsing this payload with
jqin bash robust enough, or should I be using a custom script (like Node.js/TypeScript)?More importantly, how do I securely handle authentication and state (like passing the
check_run_idfrom one step to the next) for multiple, dynamic, chained API calls like this?Thanks for any advanced insights.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions