If we have a struct declaration with a typedef and the same name, the comment is not generated on the Rust binding.
/**
* This is a forward declared struct with typedef
*/
typedef struct Struct2 Struct2;
binding:
#[repr(C)]
pub struct Struct2 {
_unused: [u8; 0],
}If we change the C typedef to have a non conflicting name:
/**
* This is forward declared struct alias
*/
typedef struct Struct2 Struct2_alias;
The comment is generated on top of the type alia:
#[repr(C)]
pub struct Struct2 {
_unused: [u8; 0],
}
/// This is forward declared struct alias
pub type Struct2_alias = Struct2;If we add a field to the struct, then the comment is also correctly generated:
/**
* This is forward declared struct alias
*/
typedef struct Struct2 {
/**
* This is field
*/
int field;
} Struct2;/// This is forward declared struct alias
#[repr(C)]
#[derive(Debug, Default, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct Struct2 {
/// This is field
pub field: ::std::os::raw::c_int,
}
If we have a struct declaration with a typedef and the same name, the comment is not generated on the Rust binding.
binding:
If we change the C typedef to have a non conflicting name:
The comment is generated on top of the type alia:
If we add a field to the struct, then the comment is also correctly generated: