refactor!: add blobs support to SDK api

[sainoe]

Description

Do not merge–change base against api/0.7.5` branch

In order to add Blobs support to Cosmos SDK v0.1.16-beta-polygon, we first need to upgrade its dependency to api/v0.7.5. This PR updates the tendermint proto defintion to support Blobs.

Changes

• Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
• Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
• Changes only for a subset of nodes

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it

Nodes audience

In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)

Checklist

• I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
• I have added sufficient documentation in code
• I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply

Cross repository changes

• This PR requires changes to bor
  • In case link the PR here:
• This PR requires changes to heimdall-v2
  • In case link the PR here:
• This PR requires changes to matic-cli
  • In case link the PR here:

Testing

• I have added unit tests
• I have added tests to CI
• I have tested this code manually on local environment
• I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
• I have tested this code manually on amoy/mumbai
• I have created new e2e tests into express-cli

Manual tests

Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it

[greg-szabo]

Looks good. Once it is merged, please add a tag so we can import it in the main code.

[sergio-mena]

LGTM.
I'm not sure the references to EIP-4844 should stay. This design is independent from any EIP.
Also, at high level, the blob is associated with the block, not with individual transactions. Although the logic using it may do so.

[marcello33]

LGTM, leaving last word to @avalkov