fix: add pint call to enforce initialization of unit registry#1146
fix: add pint call to enforce initialization of unit registry#1146
Conversation
|
🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request! Tips
|
WalkthroughA new import statement for Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine. If you would also like our AI-powered code review then let us know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (1)
16-16: LGTM!The import statement for
pintis correctly placed.
| self.history_index = -1 | ||
| self.last_executed_algorithm = "" | ||
| self._points = None | ||
| pint.get_application_registry()("nm") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider storing the result of the pint.get_application_registry("nm") call.
The call to pint.get_application_registry("nm") ensures the initialization of the unit registry. Consider storing the result in a variable for potential future use or for clarity.
- pint.get_application_registry()("nm")
+ registry = pint.get_application_registry("nm")Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1146 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 93.01% 93.01%
========================================
Files 207 207
Lines 32656 32658 +2
========================================
+ Hits 30374 30376 +2
Misses 2282 2282 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |



Workaround for hgrecco/pint#2039
Summary by CodeRabbit
pintlibrary for unit management, improving flexibility and precision in handling measurements.