overhaul jobby to use sacct

[kopardev]

• refactor: jobby only uses sacct now; removed depencies on dashboard_cli; HPC-agnostic
• refactor: adding tabulate dependency for jobby

[kopardev]

@kelly-sovacool .. can you update https://ccbr.github.io/Tools/reference/jobby.html#ccbr_tools.jobby for the new jobby?

[kelly-sovacool]

@kelly-sovacool .. can you update https://ccbr.github.io/Tools/reference/jobby.html#ccbr_tools.jobby for the new jobby?

FYI that page is generated from the docstrings in src/ccbr_tools/jobby.py (https://github.com/CCBR/Tools/blob/4e265bbc3a8f0401e218b81bcb4cc982ddc30aaa/src/ccbr_tools/jobby.py)

[kelly-sovacool]

• I suggested improving how exceptions are captured and raised in several places.
• The regex for nextflow will have to use something like 'TaskHandler[jobId: [0-9]*' to actually capture them.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 47.74194% with 81 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.63%. Comparing base (2478be2) to head (941a3aa).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ccbr_tools/jobby.py	47.74%	81 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #59      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.77%   70.63%   -2.15%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        1561     1539      -22     
==========================================
- Hits         1136     1087      -49     
- Misses        425      452      +27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[kopardev]

@kelly-sovacool .. what are these

[kelly-sovacool]

@kopardev

@kelly-sovacool .. what are these

Code coverage reports. This PR will decrease the overall project coverage by 2%. We could break up the jobby code into more functions and write more unit tests if we wanted to improve that figure.

[kelly-sovacool]

FYI @kopardev I am moving module_list to another branch. It is completely independent of the jobby changes here and it would be better to hash that out in a separate PR.
#63