Skip to content

experiment(dev): introduce new OTLP load generator for scenario-based workloads#1140

Closed
tobz wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
tobz/otlp-generator-dreamweaver-20260130
Closed

experiment(dev): introduce new OTLP load generator for scenario-based workloads#1140
tobz wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
tobz/otlp-generator-dreamweaver-20260130

Conversation

@tobz
Copy link
Member

@tobz tobz commented Jan 30, 2026

Summary

Change Type

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Non-functional (chore, refactoring, docs)
  • Performance

How did you test this PR?

References

@tobz tobz added the type/experiment A change that is still currently being worked on or tested to prove viability. label Jan 30, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added area/core Core functionality, event model, etc. area/components Sources, transforms, and destinations. area/test All things testing: unit/integration, correctness, SMP regression, etc. labels Jan 30, 2026
@tobz tobz force-pushed the tobz/otlp-generator-dreamweaver-20260130 branch from 5ef0634 to d51077b Compare January 30, 2026 18:44
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot removed area/core Core functionality, event model, etc. area/components Sources, transforms, and destinations. labels Jan 30, 2026
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Binary Size Analysis (Agent Data Plane)

Target: e33b714 (baseline) vs d51077b (comparison) diff
Analysis Type: Stripped binaries (debug symbols excluded)
Baseline Size: 27.63 MiB
Comparison Size: 27.63 MiB
Size Change: +0 B (+0.00%)
Pass/Fail Threshold: +5%
Result: PASSED ✅

Changes by Module

Module File Size Symbols

Detailed Symbol Changes

    FILE SIZE        VM SIZE    
 --------------  -------------- 
  [ = ]       0  [ = ]       0    TOTAL

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Regression Detector (Agent Data Plane)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: a5fb50bf-4257-46fc-b42e-94442f1745a7

Baseline: e33b714
Comparison: d51077b
Diff

❌ Experiments with retried target crashes

This is a critical error. One or more replicates failed with a non-zero exit code. These replicates may have been retried. See Replicate Execution Details for more information.

  • dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_memory
  • otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_cpu

Optimization Goals: ✅ Improvement(s) detected

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_memory memory utilization -7.57 [-7.80, -7.35] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_throughput ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.09, +0.16] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_cpu % cpu utilization -1.85 [-6.87, +3.17] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_memory memory utilization -6.14 [-6.66, -5.62] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization +4.96 [-25.01, +34.94] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization +2.82 [-52.71, +58.35] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_heavy memory utilization +0.21 [+0.09, +0.34] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_memory memory utilization +0.10 [-0.61, +0.80] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_throughput ingress throughput +0.08 [-0.04, +0.20] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_medium memory utilization +0.07 [-0.12, +0.25] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_throughput ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.09, +0.16] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_throughput ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.15, +0.16] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_throughput ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.04, +0.05] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_ultraheavy memory utilization +0.01 [-0.13, +0.14] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_throughput ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.06, +0.06] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_throughput ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.05, +0.05] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_throughput ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.13, +0.13] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_throughput ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.06, +0.04] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.01 [-0.19, +0.18] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization -0.03 [-51.94, +51.87] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.04 [-0.24, +0.15] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_low memory utilization -0.09 [-0.25, +0.08] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization -0.15 [-1.64, +1.33] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.29 [-0.47, -0.10] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.30 [-0.49, -0.11] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.40 [-0.59, -0.21] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_cpu % cpu utilization -0.41 [-6.41, +5.60] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_idle memory utilization -0.47 [-0.52, -0.41] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_cpu % cpu utilization -0.73 [-3.20, +1.74] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization -0.84 [-6.44, +4.76] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_cpu % cpu utilization -1.85 [-6.87, +3.17] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_memory memory utilization -6.14 [-6.66, -5.62] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_memory memory utilization -7.57 [-7.80, -7.35] 1 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
quality_gates_rss_dsd_heavy memory_usage 10/10 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_low memory_usage 10/10 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_medium memory_usage 10/10 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_dsd_ultraheavy memory_usage 10/10 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)
quality_gates_rss_idle memory_usage 10/10 (metrics) (profiles) (logs)

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Normal Replicate Execution Failures (non-profiling)

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_memory comparison 8 Failed to shutdown when requested Debug Dashboard
otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_cpu comparison 7 Failed to shutdown when requested Debug Dashboard

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (target internal profiling)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_throughput comparison 10 Failed to shutdown when requested Debug Dashboard

@tobz
Copy link
Member Author

tobz commented Feb 11, 2026

Closing this as we've pivoted to implementing this in lading directly: DataDog/lading#1755.

@tobz tobz closed this Feb 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/test All things testing: unit/integration, correctness, SMP regression, etc. type/experiment A change that is still currently being worked on or tested to prove viability.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant