[CP Staging] Revert "Feat: Add 'Move to report' in the 'More' menu of a one-expense report" by aldo-expensify · Pull Request #84984 · Expensify/App

aldo-expensify · 2026-03-11T22:37:43Z

Reverts #84512

Fixes:
$ #84974
$ #84976
$ #85012
$ #85014

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
- The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
- The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

…e report"

melvin-bot · 2026-03-11T22:38:19Z

@stitesExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

francoisl · 2026-03-12T01:11:48Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: HybridApp

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

aldo-expensify · 2026-03-12T01:16:05Z

I'm investigating the failing test meanwhile, not sure if it is related

The failure doesn't look related to me:

FAIL tests/ui/components/IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest.tsx (83.331 s)
  ● IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest › Unreported transaction tests › should route unreported distance expense to requestMoney and skip createDistanceRequest
    TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'GRANTED')
       9 | const openLimitedPhotoLibraryPicker: jest.Mock<void> = jest.fn(() => {});
      10 | const openSettings: jest.Mock<void> = jest.fn(() => {});
    > 11 | const check = jest.fn(() => RESULTS.GRANTED as string);

It seems to be failing to access this GRANTED key from RESULTS. This is still defined here:

https://github.com/zoontek/react-native-permissions/blob/b15d5e9fb6e2e3349527a64d0a5d5e9fefac52b6/src/results.ts#L1-L9

😕

The test passed locally for me:

  App git:(revert-84512-issue-83884) npm test tests/ui/components/IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest.tsx
Warning: Ignoring extra certs from `/Users/aldocanepa/Expensidev/Ops-Configs/saltfab/cacert.pem`, load failed: error:80000002:system library::No such file or directory

> new.expensify@9.3.36-0 test
> TZ=utc NODE_OPTIONS="--experimental-vm-modules --max_old_space_size=8192" jest tests/ui/components/IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest.tsx

Warning: Ignoring extra certs from `/Users/aldocanepa/Expensidev/Ops-Configs/saltfab/cacert.pem`, load failed: error:80000002:system library::No such file or directory
babel.config.js
  - api.version: 7.28.3
  - api.env: test
  - process.env.NODE_ENV: test
  - process.env.BABEL_ENV: undefined
  - running in:  babel-jest
 PASS  tests/ui/components/IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest.tsx (20.628 s)
  IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest
    ✓ should not restart the money request creation flow when sending invoice from global FAB (218 ms)
    ✓ should create a split expense for a scanned receipt (123 ms)
    ✓ should create a split expense for each scanned receipt (112 ms)
    Tax Calculation Tests
      ✓ should update tax amount when waypoints change in distance request (197 ms)
      ✓ should recalculate tax amount with foreign tax rate when currency changes (88 ms)
      ✓ should not zero out tax when re-selecting distance rate without reclaimable configured (43 ms)
      ✓ should handle edge case: tax calculation with changing distance rates (59 ms)
    Report selection guard tests
      ✓ should not fallback to route report when transaction report differs and is not usable (52 ms)
      ✓ should fallback to route report when transaction report matches the route and is not usable (47 ms)
      ✓ should use the transaction report when it is allowed, even if it differs from the route (47 ms)
    Unreported transaction tests
      ✓ should route unreported manual expense to requestMoney and skip trackExpense (55 ms)
      ✓ should route unreported distance expense to requestMoney and skip createDistanceRequest (47 ms)
    Distance request tests
      ✓ should call createDistanceRequest with personalDetails for non-unreported distance expense (51 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       13 passed, 13 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        21.432 s
Ran all test suites matching /tests\/ui\/components\/IOURequestStepConfirmationPageTest.tsx/i.

melvin-bot · 2026-03-12T01:23:00Z

@aldo-expensify looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

aldo-expensify · 2026-03-12T01:23:27Z

Emergency label: removed because this is a straight revert and I believe the failing tests is unrelated

github-actions · 2026-03-12T01:23:29Z

🚧 @aldo-expensify has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2026-03-12T01:28:00Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #84984.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-6335360-3d8daef-099d81665ef12600a5f8ac96537ab5e10588fd80/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-6335360-3d8daef-ae8b58dc5f8cb54e133be47276fdc45cb2f262bb/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://84984.pr-testing.expensify.com

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

OSBotify · 2026-03-12T01:33:58Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Revert "Feat: Add 'Move to report' in the 'More' menu of a one-expense report" (cherry picked from commit 6335360) (cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)

OSBotify · 2026-03-12T11:41:45Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 9.3.36-4 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎	cancelled 🔪

OSBotify · 2026-03-12T21:53:28Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 9.3.36-10 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2026-03-12T22:52:41Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.3.36-10 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2026-03-12T23:19:53Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 9.3.37-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2026-03-16T10:07:46Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.37-10 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Revert "Feat: Add 'Move to report' in the 'More' menu of a one-expens…

a3b8a6c

…e report"

aldo-expensify requested review from a team as code owners March 11, 2026 22:37

melvin-bot bot assigned aldo-expensify Mar 11, 2026

melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and stitesExpensify and removed request for a team March 11, 2026 22:37

francoisl approved these changes Mar 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

aldo-expensify merged commit 6335360 into main Mar 12, 2026
54 of 59 checks passed

aldo-expensify deleted the revert-84512-issue-83884 branch March 12, 2026 01:22

melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Mar 12, 2026

aldo-expensify removed the Emergency label Mar 12, 2026

mountiny changed the title ~~Revert "Feat: Add 'Move to report' in the 'More' menu of a one-expense report"~~ [CP Staging] Revert "Feat: Add 'Move to report' in the 'More' menu of a one-expense report" Mar 12, 2026

OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Mar 12, 2026

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2026

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2026-03-11 #84953

Closed

This was referenced Mar 12, 2026

Expense - Create report button shows one workspace, but report is created in another workspace #85012

Closed

Expense- Report field is disabled when per diem rates are removed, but Move to report is shown #85014

Closed

Conversation

aldo-expensify commented Mar 11, 2026 • edited by luacmartins Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

francoisl commented Mar 12, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

aldo-expensify commented Mar 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

aldo-expensify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 16, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

aldo-expensify commented Mar 11, 2026 •

edited by luacmartins

Loading

aldo-expensify commented Mar 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading