Draft
Conversation
Contributor
Member
Author
|
we might need to keep some of the strike-format display fonts? not for releasing but in case we want to fix some problem? |
Contributor
|
I would be enough if they are kept under fonts/displayfonts/ in the obsolete repo. We could refer to them systematically with {OBSOLETE}/fonts/displayfonts/, where {OBSOLETE} is a pseudohost pointing to obsolete's local clone.
… On Feb 27, 2026, at 8:28 AM, Larry Masinter ***@***.***> wrote:
masinter
left a comment
(Interlisp/medley#2502)
<#2502 (comment)>
we might need to keep some of the strike-format display fonts? not for releasing but in case we want to fix some problem?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2502 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQSTUJMQFII7G4YJT3LFO6D4OBWCLAVCNFSM6AAAAACVNN3IWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTSNZTHA2TONBWGA>.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Contributor
|
How about the (Xerox) logo font? |
Contributor
|
There is a Medley font for XEROXLOGO48
… On Feb 27, 2026, at 10:31 AM, Nick Briggs ***@***.***> wrote:
nbriggs
left a comment
(Interlisp/medley#2502)
<#2502 (comment)>
How about the (Xerox) logo font?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2502 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQSTUJMJFYNY3EFB24GMMRD4OCEPTAVCNFSM6AAAAACVNN3IWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTSNZUGQZDCOJYGA>.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Member
Author
i don't think it's a good idea to require anyone to maintain a local clone of the 'obsolete' repository. As a fallback it's fine, but if you need to refer to it systematically implies it's not really "obsolete". |
Contributor
|
Nobody should be "required" to maintain an obsolete repository with obsolete fonts. But those fonts should still be available in the event that, for some reason, we want to rebuild our current fonts from the original sources. For example, to fill in the Gacha glyphs from a BDF mono font before going to, say, Modern as we do now. In that case we would want to start fresh.
… On Mar 1, 2026, at 7:48 PM, Larry Masinter ***@***.***> wrote:
i don't think it's a good idea to require anyone to maintain a local clone of the 'obsolete' repository. As a fallback it's fine, but if you need to refer to it systematically implies it's not really "obsolete".
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.