Skip to content

Use julia-actions/cache in CI#116

Merged
JamesWrigley merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ci-caching
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Use julia-actions/cache in CI#116
JamesWrigley merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ci-caching

Conversation

@JamesWrigley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The advantage is that the whole depot will be cached instead of just the artifacts. Also deleted the build step since Distributed doesn't have a build.jl file.

The advantage is that the whole depot will be cached instead of just the
artifacts. Also deleted the build step since Distributed doesn't have a build.jl
file.
@JamesWrigley JamesWrigley self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@giordano giordano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Running CI on nightly means that precompile cache will be invalidated somewhat frequently, but moving to julia-actions/cache is a good idea regardless.

@JamesWrigley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Speaking of which, should we be running CI on 1.11+ now that it's upgradeable?

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.33%. Comparing base (9c5d73a) to head (20e2ce7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #116   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.33%   79.33%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1916     1916           
=======================================
  Hits         1520     1520           
  Misses        396      396           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants