Conversation
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.
vtjnash
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2023
aviatesk
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2023
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds. (cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds. (cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds. (cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds. (cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of ``` @inbounds (1,2)[1] ``` With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds. (cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.