staticdata: prune backedges table during serialization#58156
Merged
Conversation
vtjnash
added
re-land
Member
Unfortunately, this appears to have broken the |
vtjnash
force-pushed
the
jn/58078-prune-backedges
branch
from
60d7f62 to
fcbe226
Compare
vtjnash
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2025
While #58156 was supposed to be fairly trivial, it ended up uncovering many bugs in the unusual ways that trimming and binding partition had been added to the serialization format. This attempts to reorganize them to be handled more consistently and with fewer mistakes.
After the bindings change, there is quite a lot of garbage in here now at runtime (it does not de-duplicate entries added for bindings), so attempt to do a bit of that during serialization.
vtjnash
force-pushed
the
jn/58078-prune-backedges
branch
from
fcbe226 to
6d55385
Compare
oscardssmith
removed
the
merge me
LebedevRI
pushed a commit
to LebedevRI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2025
While JuliaLang#58156 was supposed to be fairly trivial, it ended up uncovering many bugs in the unusual ways that trimming and binding partition had been added to the serialization format. This attempts to reorganize them to be handled more consistently and with fewer mistakes.
LebedevRI
pushed a commit
to LebedevRI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2025
After the bindings change, there is quite a lot of garbage in here now at runtime (it does not de-duplicate entries added for bindings), so attempt to do a bit of that during serialization. Re-landing part of JuliaLang#58078
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
While #58156 was supposed to be fairly trivial, it ended up uncovering many bugs in the unusual ways that trimming and binding partition had been added to the serialization format. This attempts to reorganize them to be handled more consistently and with fewer mistakes. (cherry picked from commit 828e3a1)
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After the bindings change, there is quite a lot of garbage in here now at runtime (it does not de-duplicate entries added for bindings), so attempt to do a bit of that during serialization.
This should be a very safe part of #58078