-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 365
[Interactive Graph] Update tangent notes for AI shared context #3333
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ivyolamit
wants to merge
3
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
LEMS-3937/update-tangent-notes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+16
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| --- |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We definitely shouldn't have two different versions of a function called
canonicalTangentCoefficientsbecause that would be an oxymoron 😆 Do we need to update thekmathfunction? I don't understand why the math would be different.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this section, References > Grapher Widget (Legacy Tangent)
this part here is just mentioning what logic we currently have in the Grapher widget.
But since we will be deprecating the Grapher widget in the near future, the proper place to have the logic will be in
packages/kmath/src/geometry.tsThis is following the pattern we have forsin:Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The other option I can think is to move all the logic in kmath, and update the Grapher logic to use it. What do you think?Update: Thinking more about this during current implementation, IMO it will be best to not touch the
grapher-util.tssince this is currently a private function used within the file and additionally will be deprecated anyways. Moving forward anything related to tangent will use the function ingeometry.tsthis also follows the pattern forsin.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally we won't be duplicating code. If we need logic in more than one place, it should be moved rather than duplicated - even if one of the places is deprecated. This isn't a hill I'd die on though and isn't even something I follow religiously.
My main point is the naming is bad. "Canonical" is the "authoritative source" - the source of truth. If there's two functions roughly doing the same thing, named the same thing, and are both "canonical", that's an oxymoron and is confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I was maybe misunderstanding the name. "Canonical" is not in the sense that this is the canonical function for tangent coefficients, this is the function for canonical tangent coefficients. 🤔 Maybe we just need to comment it to make it clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏼 ok got your perspective now. Since I'm already implementing the tangent graph, are you okay if I have a different PR as a follow-up to specifically update the Grapher?