Skip to content

DRAFT: New test to demonstrate GNU failure#689

Draft
dustinswales wants to merge 88 commits intoNCAR:developfrom
dustinswales:bug/unalloc_var_to_Group
Draft

DRAFT: New test to demonstrate GNU failure#689
dustinswales wants to merge 88 commits intoNCAR:developfrom
dustinswales:bug/unalloc_var_to_Group

Conversation

@dustinswales
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dustinswales dustinswales commented Sep 26, 2025

New test to demonstrate GNU failure when passing unallocated fields into the Group cap.
See error HERE

This test will be added when (?) we move to pass host DDTs into suite Caps

User interface changes?: No

Related to #690

Testing:
test removed:
unit tests:
system tests:
manual testing:

mkavulich and others added 8 commits February 4, 2025 15:06
…an modules in the correct place (#4)

Update CMakeLists.txt to:
- Bring in updates from NCAR ccpp-framework main as needed and update CMakeLists.txt to modern cmake version 3
- Support NEPTUNE cmake build while retaining compatibility with UFS/SCM
…an modules in the correct place (NCAR#653)

**Update src/CMakeLists.txt: use modern cmake features to install
Fortran modules in the correct place**

Update CMakeLists.txt to modern cmake version 3 and support NEPTUNE
cmake build while retaining compatibility with UFS/SCM

User interface changes?: No

Fixes: [Github issue #s] n/a

Testing: all CI tests pass, ran `capgen` and `prebuild` tests locally on
my laptop - all pass
  test removed:
  unit tests:
  system tests:
  manual testing:

Associated PRs:
- ccpp-physics: ufs-community/ccpp-physics#259
- FV3: NOAA-EMC/ufsatm#940
- ufs-weather-model:
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2659
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gold2718 gold2718 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this PR be prioritized so that we can work towards a solution?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@climbfuji climbfuji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Obviously, we can't merge this because it breaks the CI tests. Is the intention to keep this PR open until a fix is in place and the test passes?

@gold2718
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Obviously, we can't merge this because it breaks the CI tests. Is the intention to keep this PR open until a fix is in place and the test passes?

Fair. I suppose I can always cut a branch from this PR branch if I want to play with the problem.

@climbfuji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Obviously, we can't merge this because it breaks the CI tests. Is the intention to keep this PR open until a fix is in place and the test passes?

Fair. I suppose I can always cut a branch from this PR branch if I want to play with the problem.

Correct, and we'll keep this branch up to date with develop so that you can always pull that in, too.

@dustinswales dustinswales changed the title New test to demonstrate GNU failure DRAFT: New test to demonstrate GNU failure Jan 8, 2026
@dustinswales dustinswales marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2026 17:37
@climbfuji climbfuji force-pushed the bug/unalloc_var_to_Group branch from c3ec858 to 8088179 Compare April 27, 2026 21:53
Comment thread scripts/suite_objects.py Outdated
'scheme_files':'',
'suites':''})

# DH* MOVE THIS ELSEWHERE
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note. With my latest updates, all this will be removed again - existing functionality suffices!

@climbfuji
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@dustinswales I updated your branch from develop and fixed the merge conflicts; I also fixed the failing Python test (updated advection test after merging Courtney's branch). All GitHub CI tests pass.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants