Repository navigation
perf: reduce compiler scanning costs - #326
Draft
YunaBraska wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
YunaBraska wants to merge 2 commits into
YunaBraska wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
No dependencies, persistent caches, concurrency policy, public CLI behavior or supported-JDK accounting changes. Net production line count is unchanged.
Verification
Review And Remaining Risk
The complete diff was reviewed for parser boundaries, UTF-16/surrogate semantics, ownership, concurrency, preserved diagnostics, complexity and test isolation. No open correctness finding remains in the changed code. Production code has 37 added and 37 removed lines. The 121 net code additions are regression tests.
One native Clang invocation failed while preparing
try-finally-exception, before its sanitizer run. The generated C was byte-identical to the already successful acceptance fixture and passed a direct Clang syntax check. An unchanged rebuild and a clean repeat of the entire 15-case exception sanitizer scope both passed. No crash report was found and the original invocation's underlying cause remains unknown. This observation is retained rather than hidden by the successful repeat.Both the implementation commit and final head
ba699452passed CI, including Linux x64/ARM64 and macOS ARM64 package lanes. Final-head result: 30 successful checks, seven intentional workflow skips, no failures. The published diff matches the reviewed local changes, the branch is clean and pushed, and GitHub reportsCLEANagainst current mainf028bf40. This PR remains a draft pending explicit merge approval. No new JDK/platform support or universal performance guarantee is claimed.