You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.
When a Proxy is closed and then restarted, its big key information does not exist, but the Pika big key information still exists, causing the Proxy and Pika big key information to be inconsistent.
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.
Is the function of this PR to do big key analysis? Is it still necessary to do circuit breaker logic? You can write down your ideas and steps in detail.
4, because the PR introduces a significant amount of new code (482 lines in a single file) which implements complex logic for monitoring and logging based on various conditions. The complexity of the logic, combined with the use of concurrency and atomic operations, requires careful review to ensure correctness, thread safety, and performance.
🧪 Relevant tests
No
⚡ Possible issues
Possible Bug: The CheckResponseByArrayReturned function may return false negatives in scenarios where the array length is not an even number but should still be considered for monitoring based on content size or other criteria. This is due to the condition that immediately returns false if the array length is not an even number.
Performance Concern: The extensive use of atomic operations and potential frequent locking in a high-throughput environment (like a proxy server handling many requests) could lead to performance bottlenecks. Review and possibly benchmark sections where atomic variables are heavily used to ensure that performance is not adversely affected.
🔒 Security concerns
No
Code feedback:
relevant file
codis/pkg/proxy/monitorBkv.go
suggestion
Consider adding a default case in switch statements where flags are checked (e.g., in CheckBatchsizeOfRequest). This would handle unexpected flags values gracefully, potentially logging a warning or error. This is important to ensure that all possible paths are accounted for, enhancing the robustness of the code. [important]
Implement a mechanism to limit the frequency of logging to avoid potential I/O bottlenecks when many records are generated in a short period. This could be achieved by introducing a rate limiter or a buffer that periodically flushes records to the log. [important]
Refactor the repeated pattern of checking conditions and setting values in functions like XMonitorSetMaxLengthOfValue into a helper function to reduce code duplication. This will make the code cleaner and easier to maintain. [medium]
For better maintainability, consider separating the large monitorBkv.go file into smaller files, each focusing on a specific aspect of functionality (e.g., request monitoring, response monitoring, utility functions). This modular approach can make the codebase easier to navigate and maintain. [medium]
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.
Is the function of this PR to perform key analysis? Is it still necessary to do circuit breaker logic? You can write down your ideas and steps in detail.
This PR is about <bigKey/Request monitoring, black and white list, qps token bucket current limit> and the circuit breaker in the above situation (the percentage can be set). I will explain the ideas and steps in a blog later.
Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.
When a Proxy is closed and then restarted, its big key information does not exist, but the Pika big key information still exists, causing the Proxy and Pika big key information to be inconsistent.
The current solution is to migrate MonitorLog information from memory to disk. The new proxy instance can read the previous Log information from the disk file. The specific implementation is being discussed with @chejinge instructor.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#1691
#2228