Skip to content

[Feature] Support ignore boxes in nanodet head#480

Merged
RangiLyu merged 7 commits into
RangiLyu:mainfrom
zero0kiriyu:main
Dec 22, 2022
Merged

[Feature] Support ignore boxes in nanodet head#480
RangiLyu merged 7 commits into
RangiLyu:mainfrom
zero0kiriyu:main

Conversation

@zero0kiriyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment thread nanodet/model/head/nanodet_plus_head.py Outdated
Comment thread nanodet/model/head/nanodet_plus_head.py Outdated
Comment thread nanodet/model/head/assigner/dsl_assigner.py Outdated
Comment thread nanodet/model/head/assigner/dsl_assigner.py
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Dec 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #480 (128955d) into main (ad410c2) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 54.54%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #480      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.71%   74.69%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines        4572     4600      +28     
  Branches      777      716      -61     
==========================================
+ Hits         3416     3436      +20     
- Misses        971      974       +3     
- Partials      185      190       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.69% <54.54%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nanodet/data/dataset/coco.py 74.44% <0.00%> (+1.61%) ⬆️
nanodet/model/head/assigner/atss_assigner.py 85.13% <25.00%> (-7.41%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/head/assigner/dsl_assigner.py 83.33% <28.57%> (+1.51%) ⬆️
nanodet/data/transform/warp.py 84.44% <50.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/head/nanodet_plus_head.py 73.87% <76.47%> (+0.97%) ⬆️
nanodet/model/head/gfl_head.py 86.00% <80.00%> (-0.55%) ⬇️
nanodet/model/loss/utils.py 74.07% <0.00%> (-3.71%) ⬇️
... and 1 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants