Skip to content

Conversation

@stof
Copy link
Contributor

@stof stof commented Aug 10, 2020

The doc was missing the case of keeping the default insertion point based on the direction.

closes #1861

The doc was missing the case of keeping the default insertion point based on the direction
Copy link
Contributor

@waynevanson waynevanson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice one, thank you :)

@waynevanson waynevanson merged commit 340e8a2 into SortableJS:master Aug 17, 2020
@stof stof deleted the patch-1 branch August 17, 2020 08:14
laukstein pushed a commit to laukstein/Sortable that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
…1878)

The doc was missing the case of keeping the default insertion point based on the direction.
laukstein pushed a commit to laukstein/Sortable that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
…1878)

The doc was missing the case of keeping the default insertion point based on the direction.
owen-m1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2020
Runi-c pushed a commit to Tupperbox/Sortable that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarifying the signature of the onMove callback

2 participants