Hi everyone, I’m Liam YW Eddiman.
Although my initial notes started as a use-case, the work has now expanded
into a more complete domain framework for applying KERI to regulated
healthcare and culturally-rooted identity systems.
The repository here reflects that broader scope:
https://github.com/liamyweddiman/keri-tcm-identity
It includes:
• practitioner identity models (lineage, training, credential governance)
• herbal medicine provenance chains
• event-chain structures
• draft schema concepts
• documentation for how KERI may support a healthcare-grade trust framework
So instead of a single application example, this has become a structured
"KERI for TCM identity and provenance" mini-framework.
Before preparing any PR, I’d like to ask maintainers:
-
For work that is broader than a use-case, and closer to a domain-specific
identity/provenance framework, where would such material best fit within
the KERI documentation ecosystem?
-
Would it be more appropriate to:
• contribute a new subfolder under /docs (e.g., /docs/domain-healthcare),
• add selected components to /docs/use-cases,
• or treat this as external community documentation and simply link to it?
-
Are there conventions or expectations for contributing domain-specific
architectures (not only use cases) to the project?
I’m happy to adapt structure, terminology, and documentation format based on
your guidance.
Thank you,
— Liam YW Eddiman