Fix package usage policy not getting set automatically from the license #200 #262
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ixin #200 Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
This was referenced Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is likely a side effect of recent changes on the update_from_data() method that builds a
update_fieldslist to trigger a proper SQL UPDATE.The associated package/license policy is properly set on the model in SetPolicyFromLicenseMixin but the
usage_policyentry is missing from theupdate_fields. As a result theusage_policyvalue is not included in the UPDATE.Also contains a workaround for #30