Repository navigation
Workflows + nested sub-agents — split into reviewable PRs #33478
Description
There've been a few asks for Claude-Code-style workflows in opencode (#32166, #29059, #30308). @VasyaYovbak built a working version in #29789, but it came in as one ~40k-line PR that's really hard to review.
I rebased that work onto current dev and broke it into six PRs that each do one thing:
- feat(workflow): engine-core (1/6) — modularized workflow engine, split from #29789 #32390 — workflow engine (core)
- feat(workflow): server routes + SDK (2/6) — split from #29789 #32392 — server routes + SDK
- feat(workflow): TUI workflow dialogs (3/6) — split from #29789 #32393 — TUI dialogs
- feat(workflow): web app + desktop (4/6) — split from #29789 #32394 — web app + desktop
- feat(workflow): ctx.tool + plugin registration (5/6) — split from #29789 #32395 — ctx.tool + plugin registration
- docs(workflow): workflows guide (6/6) — split from #29789 #32396 — docs
They're a stack, but each one is small enough to read on its own, and all six are green and mergeable against current dev right now. I'll keep them rebased.
#32301 is separate and smaller: it lets sub-agents spawn sub-agents (fixes #23091 and #13715) and doesn't touch the workflow stack.
@dzianisv also has a workflow implementation in his fork — if you'd rather have one upstream version, I can reconcile the two.
Mainly I wanted to check with @thdxr / @kitlangton whether this is something you'd want upstream. If so, it's ready to review and I'll keep it current. If the design needs changes first, let me know.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Jun 23, 2026
This issue doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines.
What needs to be fixed:
[FEATURE]:), or Question. This issue appears to be a coordination/design-review request — consider reformatting it as a Feature Request or Question using the appropriate template.Please edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.
This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:
If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.
mguttmann commentedon Jun 23, 2026
Consolidating into #32166 — that's the existing feature issue for this work, and I've posted the reviewable-PR-split update there. Closing this as a duplicate.