Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 08, 2023 #36117

Activity

1. eladkal

   added

   kind:metaHigh-level information important to the communityHigh-level information important to the community

   testing statusStatus of testing releasesStatus of testing releases

   on Dec 7, 2023
2. melugoyal commented on Dec 8, 2023

   

   melugoyal

   on Dec 8, 2023

   More actions

   #35694 working as expected

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Elad Kalif
3. airflow-oss-bot

   added 2 commits that reference this issue on Dec 8, 2023

   Updating setup.cfg with RC provider packages on apache/airflow#36117

   ecc52de

   Updating setup.cfg with RC provider packages on apache/airflow#36117

   2fc469a
4. atrbgithub commented on Dec 8, 2023

   

   atrbgithub

   on Dec 8, 2023

   Last edited by atrbgithub

   Contributor

   More actions

   An issue has been raised with #34919

   Unfortunately it looks like it has broken GCSObjectsWithPrefixExistenceSensor.

   Testing myself I can confirm that the following code is able to create the error:

   from airflow.providers.google.cloud.hooks.gcs import GCSHook
   res = GCSHook().list(
           bucket_name='a-testbucket',
           prefix='a/prefix/in/the/bucket/'
   )
   print(res)

   Please do not include this change.

   Edit: I've raised a PR #36130 which appears to fix this issue for me when testing locally.
5. eladkal commented on Dec 9, 2023

   

   eladkal

   on Dec 9, 2023

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Docker provider will be excluded from rc1
6. hussein-awala commented on Dec 9, 2023

   

   hussein-awala

   on Dec 9, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   I tested my change on the Kubernetes executor, and most of the changes in the Amazon provider, all work as expected.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Elad Kalif
7. pankajastro commented on Dec 9, 2023

   

   pankajastro

   on Dec 9, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   As @atrbgithub has mentioned above #34919 is breaking an existing DAG. so we might need to exclude Google provider

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by atrbgithub
8. eladkal commented on Dec 9, 2023

   

   eladkal

   on Dec 9, 2023

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   so we might need to exclude Google provider

   Yes. Google provider will also have RC2

   👍React with 👍2Reacted by Pankaj Singh and atrbgithub
9. potiuk commented on Dec 10, 2023

   

   potiuk

   on Dec 10, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   Tested mssql - all looks good.

   One more thing I noticed - the removed daskexecutor has not been prepared. We have this in the release process, so it's easy to miss:

   NOTE! When you want to release a provider marked for removal (needed in order to prepare last release of the provider), package for the provider will not be prepared when you prepare documentation for all providers - you have to specifically use the provider name in a separate command. For example to prepare documentation for removed.provider provider marked for removal you need to run separately this command:
   
   breeze release-management prepare-provider-packages --package-format both removed.provider
   

   But maybye we will change it in the future - we have more removed providers coming. So possibly we shoudl automatically add removed providers to the list of providers prepared (both for documentation and package building - so that we do not have to remember to prepare them. That was probably bad idea to not add them in the first place.

   @eladkal -> I guess we should include rc2 (even if there was no rc1) for daskexecutor.
10. potiuk commented on Dec 10, 2023

    

    potiuk

    on Dec 10, 2023

    Last edited by potiuk

    Member

    More actions

    One small update - as @pankajastro noticed in #32319 (comment) - there is a case where we are not handling properly the fact that handler can return either list of rows or row - in both ODBC and DAtabricks oviders, so IMHO they should also be moved to RC2 (cc: @Joffreybvn )
11. potiuk commented on Dec 10, 2023

    

    potiuk

    on Dec 10, 2023

    Member

    More actions

    Fix to the process to automatically generate removed providers here: #36160
12. Joffreybvn commented on Dec 11, 2023

    

    Joffreybvn

    on Dec 11, 2023

    Contributor

    More actions

    Fix for #32319 (comment) is here -> #36161
13. nathadfield commented on Dec 11, 2023

    

    nathadfield

    on Dec 11, 2023

    Contributor

    More actions

    #36072 has been tested and working as expected.

    👍React with 👍1Reacted by Elad Kalif
14. eladkal commented on Dec 12, 2023

    

    eladkal

    on Dec 12, 2023

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Providers: Google, ODBC, Databricks, Docker are excluded from RC1.
15. eladkal commented on Dec 12, 2023

    

    eladkal

    on Dec 12, 2023

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Thank you everyone.
    Providers are released (excluding Google, ODBC, Databricks, Docker which we will have RC2 soon)
    I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.
16. eladkal

    closed this as completedon Dec 12, 2023