Repository navigation
Sagemaker hook: remove extra call at the end when waiting for completion #27551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -673,9 +673,8 @@ def check_status( | |
| non_terminal_states = self.non_terminal_states | ||
|
|
||
| sec = 0 | ||
| running = True | ||
|
|
||
| while running: | ||
| while True: | ||
| time.sleep(check_interval) | ||
| sec += check_interval | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -688,19 +687,16 @@ def check_status( | |
| except ClientError: | ||
| raise AirflowException("AWS request failed, check logs for more info") | ||
|
|
||
| if status in non_terminal_states: | ||
| running = True | ||
| elif status in self.failed_states: | ||
| if status in self.failed_states: | ||
| raise AirflowException(f"SageMaker job failed because {response['FailureReason']}") | ||
| else: | ||
| running = False | ||
| elif status not in non_terminal_states: | ||
| break | ||
|
|
||
| if max_ingestion_time and sec > max_ingestion_time: | ||
| # ensure that the job gets killed if the max ingestion time is exceeded | ||
| raise AirflowException(f"SageMaker job took more than {max_ingestion_time} seconds") | ||
|
|
||
| self.log.info("SageMaker Job completed") | ||
| response = describe_function(job_name) | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. there is basically no latency between the last call of the loop (l.682) and this one, and moreover the status reached is supposed to be a terminal state, so there is no need to repeat the call here. |
||
| return response | ||
|
|
||
| def check_training_status_with_log( | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
had to do this change otherwise python would complain that the
responsevariable might be uninitialized in the return clause.