Repository navigation
Reorganise issue template for providers wrt to testing process link #33439
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW the doc says:
NOTE! You should Ctrl-C and restart the connections to restart airflow components and make sure new provider packages is used.I think we should further clarify also on how to do it rather than say what needs to be done.
(explain what command to run to restart and explain how to do the verify)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eladkal -> What would you suggest ? This is unrelated and should be separate PR but I agree 👍
NOTE! You should Ctrl-C and restart the connections to restart airflow components and make sure new provider packages is used.is quite wrong .
The idea is that you need to restart the components to get the new providers loaded by new interpreters. Maybe you can phrase it well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, can do it in a separate PR :)
Do we mean to elaborate on the steps, like in each of the pane in Tmux session, kill the current process and restart using the corresponding commands like
airflow webserver,airflow scheduler,airflow triggerer,airflow celery worker(if using CeleryExecutor), etc.?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah totally separate PR.
yes, we should have explnation of what we want to do, why we are doing it and how to actually do it.
I think ideally breeze should handle it by it's own (thus making the paragraph we want to introduce now redundant)
Something like:
but that is a feature request for later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, Breeze can already handle it when specifying it at startup. We have the section Manually testing release candidate packages linked in the same document
and @potiuk recently enhanced that section a lot by giving numerous examples in PR #32948.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed - this precisely what I improved for Airflow recently (and I think it has all the aspects of what you are talking about @eladkal). It would be great if someone takes it as an example and distills that into better instructions if the current provider's ones are not good enough. Other than correcting the strange sentence I am not sure how to enhance current instructions, though?
Maybe someone could create a PR with better description and we could iterate on it to make it clearer ? I am not sure how to more describe the whys and whether the current provider instructions fail to deliver on that @eladkal ?
For the reference this is the current description for Airflow.