airflowctl: fix flaky xcom add test by using unique keys per test run#63832
Merged
bugraoz93 merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Mar 17, 2026
Merged
airflowctl: fix flaky xcom add test by using unique keys per test run#63832bugraoz93 merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
bugraoz93 merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
bugraoz93
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2026
imrichardwu
pushed a commit
to imrichardwu/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2026
…apache#63832) The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
imrichardwu
pushed a commit
to imrichardwu/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2026
…apache#63832) The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
fat-catTW
pushed a commit
to fat-catTW/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2026
…apache#63832) The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
techcodie
pushed a commit
to techcodie/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2026
…apache#63832) The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
abhijeets25012-tech
pushed a commit
to abhijeets25012-tech/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2026
…apache#63832) The xcom add test used a hardcoded key (`test_xcom_key`) which could collide with leftover state from a previous failed run where xcom delete never executed. Derive the key from the randomized `date_param` so each parametrize set gets a unique key.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
test_airflowctl_commands[xcom add]test that intermittently fails withThe XCom with key: 'test_xcom_key' with mentioned task instance already exists.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.6 following the guidelines
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.