Repository navigation
[v3-4-test] Let plugin views be scoped to specific Assets (#74609) - #74992
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Asset pages could not be scoped at all. `asset` resolved no record, so every `applies_to` path on an asset view was unevaluable and skipped, and skipping does not narrow anything -- an asset view configured with scoping showed on every asset, which is the opposite of what its author asked for. The asset is already fetched for those pages, so it costs nothing to make it a root an `applies_to` path can name, alongside the Dag, Dag Run, Task and Task Instance records. `AssetResponse` joins the models paths are validated against, so an asset path gets the same misspelling check as any other. (cherry picked from commit 230cd8a)
vatsrahul1001
requested review from
bbovenzi,
choo121600,
guan404ming,
pierrejeambrun,
ryanahamilton and
shubhamraj-git
as code owners
October 18, 2026 10:53
vatsrahul1001
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2026
Asset pages could not be scoped at all. `asset` resolved no record, so every `applies_to` path on an asset view was unevaluable and skipped, and skipping does not narrow anything -- an asset view configured with scoping showed on every asset, which is the opposite of what its author asked for. The asset is already fetched for those pages, so it costs nothing to make it a root an `applies_to` path can name, alongside the Dag, Dag Run, Task and Task Instance records. `AssetResponse` joins the models paths are validated against, so an asset path gets the same misspelling check as any other. (cherry picked from commit 230cd8a) Co-authored-by: Brent Bovenzi <brent@astronomer.io>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Manual backport of #74609 to
v3-4-test. The automatic backport failed on a cherry-pick conflict, so this was cherry-picked by hand.Conflict resolution: the only conflict was
airflow-core/newsfragments/74278.feature.rst(modify/delete). That newsfragment has already been consumed intoRELEASE_NOTES.rston the release branch, so it was dropped. All code changes applied unchanged.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines