HDFS-17918. WebHDFS client-side failover fails during NameNode fsimage loading in HA#8487
Open
magnuma3 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
Open
HDFS-17918. WebHDFS client-side failover fails during NameNode fsimage loading in HA#8487magnuma3 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
magnuma3 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:trunkfrom
Conversation
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
When NameNode is configured with HA and NameNode 1 is restarting and loading fsimage, accessing WebHDFS does not trigger client-side failover.
During fsimage loading after NameNode restart in HA configuration, WebHDFS returns RetriableException instead of StandbyException. Because of this, the client-side failover does not work and the client keeps retrying the same NameNode. Eventually the client fails because it cannot find the active NameNode.
How was this patch tested?
Added unit test. Also verified on a real HA cluster that client-side failover works correctly after the fix.
For code changes:
LICENSE,LICENSE-binary,NOTICE-binaryfiles?AI Tooling
If an AI tool was used:
where is the name of the AI tool used.
https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html