Skip to content

[ci] Use sccache and all available CPUs in builds#10359

Merged
areusch merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
driazati:multiproc
Mar 3, 2022
Merged

[ci] Use sccache and all available CPUs in builds#10359
areusch merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
driazati:multiproc

Conversation

@driazati
Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati commented Feb 23, 2022

This adds a script to determine the CPUs for each job based on the number of executors per node, assuming and equal allocation to each executor on a node. This also enables sccache via S3 for all builds.

@driazati driazati marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2022 17:38
@areusch areusch merged commit ede5601 into apache:main Mar 3, 2022
@driazati driazati changed the title [ci] Use available CPUs in builds [ci] Use sccache and all available CPUs in builds Mar 3, 2022
ziqiangxu8457 pushed a commit to ziqiangxu8457/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2022
* [ci] Use sccache in builds

* trigger ci

* update

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Lunderberg added a commit to Lunderberg/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
`task_build.sh` was replaced with `task_build.py` in
apache#10359.  This commit updates the
`ci.py` script and the contribution documentation to use
`task_build.py` instead of `task_build.sh`.
Lunderberg added a commit to Lunderberg/tvm that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
`task_build.sh` was replaced with `task_build.py` in
apache#10359.  This commit updates the
`ci.py` script and the contribution documentation to use
`task_build.py` instead of `task_build.sh`.
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
* [ci] Use sccache in builds

* trigger ci

* update

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments