Handle srem properly when avoid_div_traps is false.#2763
Merged
Conversation
The codegen for div/rem ops has two modes, depending on the `avoid_div_traps` flag: it can either do all checks for trapping conditions explicitly, and use explicit trap instructions, then use a hardware divide instruction that will not trap (`avoid_div_traps == true`); or it can run in a mode where a hardware FP fault on the divide instruction implies a Wasm trap (`avoid_div_traps == false`). Wasmtime uses the former while Lucet (for example) uses the latter. It turns out that because we run all our spec tests run under Wasmtime, we missed a spec corner case that fails in the latter: INT_MIN % -1 == 0 per the spec, but causes a trap with the x86 signed divide/remainder instruction. Hence, in Lucet, this specific remainder computation would incorrectly result in a Wasm trap. This PR fixes the issue by just forcing use of the explicit-checks implementation for `srem` even when `avoid_div_traps` is false.
github-actions
Bot
added
cranelift
bnjbvr
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The codegen for div/rem ops has two modes, depending on the
avoid_div_trapsflag: it can either do all checks for trappingconditions explicitly, and use explicit trap instructions, then use a
hardware divide instruction that will not trap (
avoid_div_traps == true);or it can run in a mode where a hardware FP fault on the divide
instruction implies a Wasm trap (
avoid_div_traps == false). Wasmtimeuses the former while Lucet (for example) uses the latter.
It turns out that because we run all our spec tests run under Wasmtime,
we missed a spec corner case that fails in the latter: INT_MIN % -1 == 0
per the spec, but causes a trap with the x86 signed divide/remainder
instruction. Hence, in Lucet, this specific remainder computation would
incorrectly result in a Wasm trap.
This PR fixes the issue by just forcing use of the explicit-checks
implementation for
sremeven whenavoid_div_trapsis false.