-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Speed up registration of stack maps #2820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: why the trait over using a method on
CompiledModule(similar tofunc_by_pcandfunc_info) and storingArc<CompiledModule>vs the trait object?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only because the
CompiledModulelives in thewasmtime_jitcrate which thiswasmtime_runtimecrate doesn't have access to. Otherwise though there's definitely no need for dynamic trait dispatch here.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. I guess the alternative would be to use
StackMapLookupvia theVMContext, rather than a registry pointer, freeing the registry implementation to live in thewasmtimecrate, but that's just trading dynamic-dispatch during module instantiation to dynamic-dispatch at externref gc.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we did move the registry implementation to
wasmtime, I think this data structure could be a consolidated one replacingStoreFrameInfotoo, basically just a "whichCompiledModuleshould I be talking to given this pc?" which responds with an answer that we then use to lookup the appropriate information (gimmie frame info, gimmie trap info, gimmie stack maps, etc.)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact, given externref gc being a relatively expensive (and hopefully very infrequent) operation and the cost of doing trait object dispatch per frame would be negligible, I would argue
VMContextshould have*const dyn StackMapLookuprather than*mut StackMapRegistry.This frees us to remove
StackMapRegistryandStoreFrameInfoin favor of a singleCompiledModuleRegistryper store that lives inwasmtimewhich impls the runtime'sStackMapLookupand can lookup frame and trap information as well.Thoughts on this approach? Perhaps for another PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm good points! I'll look to add this to this PR, seems reasonable to do here!