-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Use mmap'd *.cwasm as a source for memory initialization images
#3787
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
alexcrichton
merged 12 commits into
bytecodealliance:main
from
alexcrichton:reuse-cwasm-mmap
Feb 10, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e8aa14c
Skip memfd creation with precompiled modules
alexcrichton c2dc0ee
Enable "memfd" support on all unix systems
alexcrichton eb9022a
Fix linux compile
alexcrichton 3b6cc54
Use `Arc<File>` instead of `MmapVecFileBacking`
alexcrichton 964a12a
Use a named struct instead of mysterious tuples
alexcrichton 55530f7
Comment about unsafety in `Module::deserialize_file`
alexcrichton fc79339
Fix tests
alexcrichton 828f513
Fix uffd compile
alexcrichton c6196c0
Always align data segments
alexcrichton fbd2e71
Update comment in build.rs
alexcrichton fe2cde5
Use rustix, not `region`
alexcrichton 6b5bd2a
Fix some confusing logic/names around memory indexes
alexcrichton File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting, was this a bug in the original code? I see the insertion above
contents.entry(page_index)so this is correct now, but seemed to be using a page index as a byte offset previously. Or was the first tuple element used as a page index elsewhere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked at a few other places but I think this was just a typo because everywhere else named and used this as a page index. I was a bit worried myself though and had to do a few double-takes as I updated this!