Fix calling call hooks with unchecked func variants#3881
Merged
Conversation
This commit fixes calling the call hooks configured in a store for host functions defined with `Func::new_unchecked` or similar. I believe that this was just an accidental oversight and there's no fundamental reason to not support this.
cfallin
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2022
github-actions
Bot
added
the
wasmtime:api
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @peterhuene DetailsThis issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit fixes calling the call hooks configured in a store for host
functions defined with
Func::new_uncheckedor similar. I believe thatthis was just an accidental oversight and there's no fundamental reason
to not support this.