Refactor binary-compatible-builds for releases#4171
Merged
alexcrichton merged 2 commits intoMay 20, 2022
Conversation
I was poking around this yesterday and noticed a few things that could be improved for our release builds: * The centos container for the x86_64 builds contained a bunch of extra tooling we no longer need such as python3 and a C++ compiler. Along with custom toolchain things this could all get removed since the C we include now is quite simple. * The aarch64 and s390x cross-compiled builds had relatively high glibc version requirements compared to the x86_64 build. This was because we don't use a container to build the cross-compiled binaries. I added containers here along the lines of the x86_64 build to use an older glibc to build the release binary to lower our version requirement. This lower the aarch64 version requirement from glibc 2.28 to 2.17. Additionally the s390x requirement dropped from 2.28 to 2.16. * To make the containers a bit easier to read/write I added `Dockerfile`s for them in a new `ci/docker` directory instead of hardcoding install commands in JS. This isn't intended to be a really big change or anything for anyone, but it's intended to keep our Linux-based builds consistent at least as best we can.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was poking around this yesterday and noticed a few things that could
be improved for our release builds:
The centos container for the x86_64 builds contained a bunch of extra
tooling we no longer need such as python3 and a C++ compiler. Along
with custom toolchain things this could all get removed since the C we
include now is quite simple.
The aarch64 and s390x cross-compiled builds had relatively high glibc
version requirements compared to the x86_64 build. This was because we
don't use a container to build the cross-compiled binaries. I added
containers here along the lines of the x86_64 build to use an older
glibc to build the release binary to lower our version requirement.
This lower the aarch64 version requirement from glibc 2.28 to 2.17.
Additionally the s390x requirement dropped from 2.28 to 2.16.
To make the containers a bit easier to read/write I added
Dockerfiles for them in a newci/dockerdirectory instead ofhardcoding install commands in JS.
This isn't intended to be a really big change or anything for anyone,
but it's intended to keep our Linux-based builds consistent at least as
best we can.