Accept explicit CPU delta time in GuestProfiler#7873
Merged
Conversation
Subscribe to Label Actioncc @peterhuene DetailsThis issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:api", "wasmtime:c-api"Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the |
Member
|
Thanks for the PR! It's ok to break the current signature and change it, so I think I would agree with you that it seems like it might be best to unconditionally take a |
alexcrichton
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
…hen building without features
alexcrichton
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently
GuestProfiler::samplealways records zero CPU time delta. This makes resulting profiles hard to interpret, especially because sampling is usually performed from epoch callback, which necessarily means that no samples at all are captured when guest is not running, thus there is no distinguishable "idle" stacktrace of any sort.While it is possible to read OS thread time counters for that, GuestProfiler is not aware whether current thread is used exclusively for running that guest. For example, I'm running multiple guests on single-threaded event loop and that would partially misattribute CPU time to neighboring guests on first/last sample. Thus I think that the embedder is better suited to measure and provide time delta to sampling function.
I left old signature intact not to break any existing users. For symmetry C bindings also got new signature, though maybe old one should be removed as it doesn't have any users yet?