Skip to content

Reverting Conditional check for Chef-ice#124

Open
vviveksharma wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
vivekSharma/Infra19WindowsSupport
Open

Reverting Conditional check for Chef-ice#124
vviveksharma wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
vivekSharma/Infra19WindowsSupport

Conversation

@vviveksharma
Copy link
Collaborator

@vviveksharma vviveksharma commented Dec 17, 2025

Description

  • As a part of this PR we have enabled the infra19 for windows support as well made the configuration changes for making infra19 conditional
  • Enhanced the test case for migrate-ice and chef-ice for supporting windows as an OS.

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have run the pre-merge tests locally and they pass.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • If Gemfile.lock has changed, I have used --conservative to do it and included the full output in the Description above.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits have been signed-off for the Developer Certificate of Origin.

@vviveksharma vviveksharma self-assigned this Dec 17, 2025
@vviveksharma vviveksharma force-pushed the vivekSharma/Infra19WindowsSupport branch from 9458e88 to 90fb4b0 Compare December 17, 2025 09:30
Signed-off-by: vviveksharma <visharma@progress.com>
@vviveksharma vviveksharma force-pushed the vivekSharma/Infra19WindowsSupport branch from 90fb4b0 to d46798b Compare December 17, 2025 09:31
@vviveksharma vviveksharma changed the title added the intial changes Reverting Conditional check for Chef-ice Dec 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant