Skip to content

Add CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter#1789

Merged
riaankleinhans merged 2 commits intocncf:mainfrom
xing-yang:infra_charter
Sep 15, 2025
Merged

Add CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter#1789
riaankleinhans merged 2 commits intocncf:mainfrom
xing-yang:infra_charter

Conversation

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

@xing-yang xing-yang commented Jul 23, 2025

@xing-yang xing-yang changed the title WIP: Add Initial CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter WIP: Add draft CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter Jul 23, 2025
@xing-yang xing-yang requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2025 14:03
@xing-yang xing-yang force-pushed the infra_charter branch 3 times, most recently from 613aa78 to 50ff98d Compare August 18, 2025 19:30
@xing-yang xing-yang changed the title WIP: Add draft CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter Add draft CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter Aug 27, 2025
@kashifest kashifest requested a review from rochaporto September 1, 2025 15:13
@kashifest
Copy link

@cncf/cncf-toc can we have some reviews on it?

@kashifest kashifest changed the title Add draft CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter Add CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter Sep 1, 2025
@mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member

/gitvote

@riaankleinhans
Copy link
Contributor

/vote

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Vote created

@riaankleinhans has called for a vote on Add CNCF TAG Infrastructure Charter (#1789).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@cncf/cncf-toc-voters

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor Against Abstain
👍 👎 👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 5months 29days 19h 12m. It will pass if at least 66% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@TheFoxAtWork TheFoxAtWork left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall LGTM, cloud native should be unhyphenated however.

@rochaporto
Copy link
Contributor

The only very minor comment is that people checking only this TAG might wonder where scheduling/batch/etc falls into, so we could consider adding it to the "out of scope" and point to workloads foundation.

Signed-off-by: xing-yang <xingyang105@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: xing-yang <xingyang105@gmail.com>
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Addressed review comments. Thanks.

Copy link

@aojea aojea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Vote status

So far 27.27% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 8

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00
@dims Pending
@linsun Pending
@chadbeaudin Pending
@kevin-wangzefeng Pending
@chira001 Pending
@kfaseela Pending
@jeremyrickard Pending
@kgamanji Pending

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

1 similar comment
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 11, 2025

Vote status

So far 27.27% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 8

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00
@dims Pending
@linsun Pending
@chadbeaudin Pending
@kevin-wangzefeng Pending
@chira001 Pending
@kfaseela Pending
@jeremyrickard Pending
@kgamanji Pending

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Vote status

So far 45.45% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
5 0 0 6

Binding votes (5)

User Vote Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
jeremyrickard In favor 2025-09-11 16:32:34.0 +00:00:00
kfaseela In favor 2025-09-11 16:28:59.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00
@dims Pending
@linsun Pending
@chadbeaudin Pending
@kevin-wangzefeng Pending
@chira001 Pending
@kgamanji Pending

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 13, 2025

Vote status

So far 63.64% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
7 0 0 4

Binding votes (7)

User Vote Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
dims In favor 2025-09-13 0:02:09.0 +00:00:00
jeremyrickard In favor 2025-09-11 16:32:34.0 +00:00:00
kevin-wangzefeng In favor 2025-09-13 2:11:10.0 +00:00:00
kfaseela In favor 2025-09-11 16:28:59.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00
@linsun Pending
@chadbeaudin Pending
@chira001 Pending
@kgamanji Pending

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Vote status

So far 72.73% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
8 0 0 3

Binding votes (8)

User Vote Timestamp
TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
chadbeaudin In favor 2025-09-14 13:32:38.0 +00:00:00
dims In favor 2025-09-13 0:02:09.0 +00:00:00
jeremyrickard In favor 2025-09-11 16:32:34.0 +00:00:00
kevin-wangzefeng In favor 2025-09-13 2:11:10.0 +00:00:00
kfaseela In favor 2025-09-11 16:28:59.0 +00:00:00
rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00
@linsun Pending
@chira001 Pending
@kgamanji Pending

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

@riaankleinhans
Copy link
Contributor

Vote passed, merging.

@riaankleinhans riaankleinhans merged commit 734880e into cncf:main Sep 15, 2025
1 check passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New to Done in CNCF TOC Board Sep 15, 2025
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 15, 2025

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

72.73% of the users with binding vote were in favor and 0.00% were against (passing threshold: 66%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
8 0 0 3

Binding votes (8)

User Vote Timestamp
@TheFoxAtWork In favor 2025-09-09 16:20:22.0 +00:00:00
@angellk In favor 2025-09-10 14:51:33.0 +00:00:00
@chadbeaudin In favor 2025-09-14 13:32:38.0 +00:00:00
@dims In favor 2025-09-13 0:02:09.0 +00:00:00
@jeremyrickard In favor 2025-09-11 16:32:34.0 +00:00:00
@kevin-wangzefeng In favor 2025-09-13 2:11:10.0 +00:00:00
@kfaseela In favor 2025-09-11 16:28:59.0 +00:00:00
@rochaporto In favor 2025-09-10 7:05:40.0 +00:00:00

Non-binding votes (2)

User Vote Timestamp
@kashifest In favor 2025-09-10 14:30:05.0 +00:00:00
@bschaatsbergen In favor 2025-09-10 16:14:49.0 +00:00:00

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.