investigate ways of shrinking the filesize

[matthewmueller]

Right now it's 15.20kb. Not too bad, but a lot of the functions are only used once.

Also, we might not need to support everything that jQuery 2.x supports or maybe not need to handle obscure bugs that people don't usually run into.

[eivindfjeldstad]

what browsers are you targeting? I would love to help out with this:D I've been thinking of doing something similar for a while, but haven't gotten around to it. CSS has been the only reason I sometimes find myself missing jQuery.

[matthewmueller]

@eivindfjeldstad that'd be great. For the product we've been building, were supporting IE9+ and for every other browser, the most current and 1 previous version.

[tj]

hrrrm yea dom itself was less than 15 i think haha, i forget now

[tj]

nvm 28, not sure where it's at now

[matthewmueller]

Tempted to replace this implementation with ianstormtaylor/css. I feel like I made a mistake porting jQuery.css to this library. Rather than fix ALL THE BUGS we can start small and build back up as we need to.

This change may have downstream effects on component/dom users.

Thoughts @Owners?

[jonathanong]

+1 i love rewrites

[mattdesl]

If a rewrite is planned, one or both of these may prove useful.

https://www.npmjs.org/package/dom-css
https://www.npmjs.org/package/prefix-style

[matthewmueller]

cool, we should probably just be using dom-css.