refactor: remove viper as a direct dependency (backport #21635)#21672
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit 57f35dc) # Conflicts: # go.mod # go.sum # runtime/v2/builder.go # runtime/v2/go.mod # runtime/v2/go.sum # runtime/v2/module.go # simapp/go.mod # simapp/go.sum # simapp/v2/go.mod # simapp/v2/go.sum # tests/go.mod # tests/go.sum # x/upgrade/go.mod # x/upgrade/go.sum
|
Cherry-pick of 57f35dc has failed: To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally |
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Description
This fell out as part of the v2 integration test work. It is desirable to interact with config through an abstraction rather than viper specifically.
Specifically, this PR introduces
core/server.DynamicConfigto interface with runtime config instead of viper, analogous to server v1AppOptions. This completely removes viper fromruntime/v2/go.mod, and moves viper to an indirect (from direct) dependency inx/genutilandx/upgrade.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
confirmed
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changetargeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
included the necessary unit and integration tests
added a changelog entry to
CHANGELOG.mdupdated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
confirmed all CI checks have passed
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores
This is an automatic backport of pull request #21635 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).