-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
various fixes #507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
various fixes #507
Conversation
this has been a no-op since building is performed in a clean build tree Fixes: dkms-project#495
do not emit the signing prologue if building will be skipped
This is only needed for getting $module and $module_version from dkms.conf while adding the module to $dkms_tree. For subsequent operations these variables are already known from $dkms_tree and having an override config interferes with e.g. querying the state of BUILD_DEPENDS.
error out on missing modules before the copying loop starts
s.t. we don't end up with a partially populated $base_dir in case of errors which fails to satisfy is_module_built() and cannot be cleaned up by unbuild_module()
to speed up development of new tests
…mative" this reverts the part of 3397c61 that separates deprecation warnings from status output
deprecation warnings for obsolete dkms.conf directives - are not helpful on removal of (old) modules - add a lot of noise to status output
|
Awesome, thanks. Will make some tests on RHEL. |
|
Please reference the other tickets you are touching with this pull request. |
|
Awesome, thank you! |
|
@anbe42 may I know the reason why duplicated modules are marked as errors? This breaks Intel ipu6-drivers. |
|
@vicamo what do you mean marked as errors? I've been packaging |
Oh, my. I thought this was to disallow duplicated modules to the in-tree ones, but it's really not. Oh, my. I need a cave to hide. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.