Skip to content

Conversation

@florimondmanca
Copy link
Contributor

@florimondmanca florimondmanca commented Aug 22, 2019

There were a few test cases that didn't have an async equivalent, so I added those (mostly by copy-paste-asyncify-ing, but I think it ends up being fine from a maintainability perspective).

Besides expanding functional coverage, these will be useful to test alternative backends that can't shouldn't be with the sync Client. For example, this will allow us to test HTTP/2 with the trio backend.

Copy link
Contributor

@sethmlarson sethmlarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @florimondmanca!

@sethmlarson sethmlarson merged commit a4b93b9 into master Aug 23, 2019
@sethmlarson sethmlarson deleted the test/more-async branch August 23, 2019 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants