[lint] treat React.use() the same as use()

[kassens]

We should probably treat React.use() the same as use() to allow it within loops and conditionals.

Ideally this would implement a test that React is imported or required from 'react', but we don't otherwise implement such a test.

[noahlemen]

lgtm overall, but it looks like we also could be reusing this fn:

react/packages/eslint-plugin-react-hooks/src/RulesOfHooks.js

Lines 52 to 59 in 790aab0

	function isReactFunction(node, functionName) {
	return (
	node.name === functionName ||
	(node.type === 'MemberExpression' &&
	node.object.name === 'React' &&
	node.property.name === functionName)
	);
	}

should that one be updated to include the lowercase 'react'?

[acdlite]

Nit: elsewhere in the implementation, isReactFunction is used to detect React.useX. Might as well use it here too to ensure the behavior is consistent.

react/packages/eslint-plugin-react-hooks/src/RulesOfHooks.js

Lines 52 to 60 in 790aab0

	function isReactFunction(node, functionName) {
	return (
	node.name === functionName ||
	(node.type === 'MemberExpression' &&
	node.object.name === 'React' &&
	node.property.name === functionName)
	);
	}