Skip to content

Conversation

@RemDelaporteMathurin
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #896

@RemDelaporteMathurin RemDelaporteMathurin linked an issue Jun 3, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@RemDelaporteMathurin RemDelaporteMathurin added the fenicsx Issue that is related to the fenicsx support label Jun 3, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.40%. Comparing base (d308842) to head (abd2961).
⚠️ Report is 161 commits behind head on fenicsx.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           fenicsx     #995   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    95.39%   95.40%           
========================================
  Files           46       46           
  Lines         2847     2852    +5     
========================================
+ Hits          2716     2721    +5     
  Misses         131      131           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@RemDelaporteMathurin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jhdark can I merge this?

@jhdark jhdark merged commit 6db0900 into fenicsx Jun 4, 2025
14 checks passed
@jhdark jhdark deleted the parrallel-assemble branch June 4, 2025 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fenicsx Issue that is related to the fenicsx support

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dolfinx.fem.assemble_scalar is not parallel safe

3 participants