feat: add Raw option for Jq operation

[rtpt-romankarwacik]

This is useful when data needs to be processed afterwards, for example strings, without needing to strip or unescape afterwards.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[GCHQDeveloper581]

Hi,

I'm going to put this one on hold for a little bit, until we resolve the issues in #2232 / #2233 as I don't want to muddy the waters with another change to the same part of the codebase.

[GCHQDeveloper581]

I'm going to put this one on hold for a little bit, until we resolve the issues in #2232 / #2233 as I don't want to muddy the waters with another change to the same part of the codebase.

Unlocking this one again - however I note there are currently merge conflicts, possibly because jq library has been changed (back).

[rtpt-romankarwacik]

Unlocking this one again - however I note there are currently merge conflicts, possibly because jq library has been changed (back).

I've changed the commit to work with the new master.

[GCHQDeveloper581]

Please could you add some tests.

It would be good to see tests for "raw" and "non raw" output on input where this makes a material difference.

Also, please address linting issue found in checks.

[rtpt-romankarwacik]

I added a test and fixed the linting.

[GCHQDeveloper581]

Looks good. Thank you for your contribution.