Skip to content

Conversation

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an incompatibility issue where rfl::TaggedUnion could not be used effectively with the rfl::NoExtraFields policy. The core change involves streamlining the internal parsing mechanism for tagged unions to ensure consistent application of necessary field transformations. This fix guarantees that tagged unions behave as expected when strict field policies are enforced, and a new test case has been introduced to confirm the correct behavior.

Highlights

  • Parsing Logic Simplification: The conditional if constexpr (no_field_names_) block within the Parser_tagged_union.hpp file has been removed, standardizing the parsing path for TaggedUnion types.
  • Consistent Field Handling: The parsing logic now consistently uses tagged_union_wrapper_no_ptr_t and applies the get_fields transformation, ensuring proper handling of fields regardless of the no_field_names_ setting.
  • New Test Case: A new test file, test_tagged_union_with_no_extra_fields.cpp, has been added to verify that rfl::TaggedUnion correctly functions when combined with the rfl::NoExtraFields policy.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses an issue where rfl::TaggedUnion was incompatible with rfl::NoExtraFields. The change in include/rfl/parsing/Parser_tagged_union.hpp refactors the parsing logic to always use a wrapper type that includes the discriminator. This simplifies the code by removing a conditional branch and correctly handles processors that check for extraneous fields. A new test case in tests/json/test_tagged_union_with_no_extra_fields.cpp is added to verify the fix. The changes are correct and improve the robustness of the library. The implementation is clean and I have no suggestions for improvement.

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit 24927df into main Jan 11, 2026
318 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants