Interface config

[aojea]

Allow to pass device configuration to configure network interface attribute and Pod namespace routing

[gauravkghildiyal]

I'm curious if this is a purely hypothetical use case, or are we thinking of some what to pic one IP out of CIDR "169.254.169.13/32"?

[aojea]

I'm curious if this is a purely hypothetical use case, or are we thinking of some what to pic one IP out of CIDR "169.254.169.13/32"?

it is not ipam, is the ip assigned to the interface

5: docker0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default
    link/ether 02:42:82:4a:d5:11 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.9.1/24 brd 192.168.9.255 scope global docker0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::42:82ff:fe4a:d511/64 scope link proto kernel_ll
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

[gauravkghildiyal]

Sorry, misread the /32 as some smaller number. So it's like some static config. Gotcha

[aojea]

Sorry, misread the /32 as some smaller number. So it's like some static config. Gotcha

yes, it is the minimum necessary for boostrap the network as defined in one of the 100s comments here opencontainers/runtime-spec#1271