Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Feb 10, 2026


⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN && git checkout -b pr-GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

gherrit-pr-id: GMSCCGFINVKEPH47JJEAFIHVBQHH73HLN
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new test case to the hermes tool to specifically verify the correct handling of multi-byte UTF-8 characters during code transformations. This ensures that the apply_edits function can accurately modify source code without corrupting or misinterpreting characters that occupy more than one byte, thereby improving the robustness and internationalization support of the tool.

Highlights

  • New Test Case: Added test_apply_edits_multibyte_utf8 to validate the apply_edits function's behavior when source code contains multi-byte UTF-8 characters, ensuring correct handling during transformations.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • tools/hermes/src/transform.rs
    • Added a new test case test_apply_edits_multibyte_utf8 to validate multi-byte UTF-8 character handling.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a valuable test case for handling multi-byte UTF-8 characters when transforming source code. The test logic is well-structured. I've identified a minor inconsistency in the test's implementation concerning the number of spaces used to replace the unsafe keyword, which contradicts the explanatory comment and the actual byte length. My feedback includes a suggestion to correct this.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.87%. Comparing base (bff925c) to head (9a292dd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           GI7PO52I2CB3PQQC425CDLSKBPLNCSPM3    #3027   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.87%   91.87%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6057     6057           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5565     5565           
  Misses                                   492      492           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants