fix: Stop checking returned page size against requested page size.#872
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue where the client-side pagination logic was overly strict, causing breakage in Google Compute's Aggregate pagination methods. The change removes the client's enforcement of returned page size matching the requested page size, instead relying on the API to handle pagination correctly. This ensures compatibility with APIs that may return varying page sizes under specific conditions, such as aggregate results, and updates the public documentation to reflect this behavior. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request removes the strict check on the returned page size against the requested page size in the pagination logic. This change is applied consistently across gRPC and REST implementations, for both synchronous and asynchronous methods. The tests are updated to reflect this change, and the documentation is updated to clarify the new behavior. The changes are reasonable and well-implemented. I've found a couple of minor typos in the updated XML documentation comments that should be corrected for clarity.
This relies on the API to do the right thing and avoids breaking Compute's Aggregate pagination methods. See b/481247371.
ec15771 to
e09f716
Compare
| var request = new PageStreamingRequest { PageSize = 0 }; | ||
| var paged = server.PagedSync(null, null, request); | ||
| Assert.Throws<NotSupportedException>(() => paged.ReadPage(1)); | ||
| Assert.NotEqual(0, paged.Count()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This highlights something we should add to the internal clarification doc: there should be at least one entry across all the keys in any given response page. I'll do that now.
This relies on the API to do the right thing and avoids breaking Compute's Aggregate pagination methods. See b/481247371.